globalist agenda » Survival and Beyond

The following are excerpts from a 30 page research paper by Dr. Leonard Horowitz on the Rockefeller Foundation’s agenda of mass mind control using sound, music, media manipulation and the institution of 440Hz as the world standard for instrument tuning.

By Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz

This article details events in musical history that are central to understanding and treating modern psychopathology, social aggression, political corruption,genetic dysfunction, and cross-cultural degeneration of traditional values risking life on earth. This history concerns A=440Hz “standard tuning,” and the Rockefeller Foundation’s military commercialization of music. The monopolization of the music industry features this imposed frequency that is“herding” populations into greater aggression, psychosocial agitation, and emotional distress predisposing people to physical illnesses and financial impositions profiting the agents, agencies, and companies engaged in the monopoly. Alternatively, the most natural, instinctively attractive, A=444Hz (C5=528Hz) frequency that is most vividly displayed botanically has been suppressed. That is, the “good vibrations” that the plant kingdom obviously broadcasts in its greenish-yellow display, remedial to emotional distress, social aggression, and more, has been musically censored. Thus, a musical revolution is needed to advance world health and peace, and has already begun with musicians retuning their instruments to perform optimally, impact audiences beneficially, and restore integrity to the performing arts and sciences. Music makers are thus urged to communicate and debate these facts, condemn the militarization of music that has been secretly administered, and retune instruments and voices to frequencies most sustaining and healing.

Assuming the field of physics, including biophysics, is valid, and the universe,including life, is primordially constructed energetically–mathematically/harmonically/musically–energy (including bio-energy or spirituality as a medium of consciousness) impacts us physically very powerfully, and is mediated vibrationally, really hydro sonically, through sounds’ effects on water.(6)

Water, nearly eighty percent of human body weight, is a liquid crystal superconductor.“Structured water” science,(7) as well as the field of electro-genetics,(6) proves this thesis adequately, given light (photons) and sound(phonons) have been shown to signal communications within and between cells ,via a liquid crystal proteo-glycan matrix in cells and tissues.(6) This strongly evidences the theory of hydrosonic creationism involving DNA and structured water.(7)Thus, bio-creation and health restoration may have more to do with frequencies of sound energy, or music, than has been thought.

There are a lot of people who consider modern music annoying. Many become emotionally disturbed listening to certain types of music. What few people realize, regardless of the type of music played in the Western World, the standard Anglo-American tuning for instruments and voices was instituted at the same time, by the same agents and agencies, advancing acoustic war studies for inducing “mass hysteria.”(8)

Analyzing the antecedents of current geopolitics and economics, this dirty fact of musical history may be foundational to the status-quo, and instrumental to contemporary sociocultural crises, including modern pandemic psychopathology.

Throughout history there have been persons of wealth and power engaged in war-making, profiteering, and various methods of population control. In 1770,for instance, Mayer Amschel Bauer (a.k.a., Rothschild) developed plans for the creation of the Illuminati, advancing the mission of global domination through a network of central banks that his family and their silent partners controlled.(9 ,10) Many reputable authors track today’s degenerative socioeconomic trends, and aboriginal genocides, to the Illuminati’s powerful influence administered through private organizations controlling multi-national corporations and governments (i.e., secret societies and governing councils, such as the Council on Foreign Relations).(6-15)

“As a result of this influence,” wrote Thomas D. Schauf, in a controversial review article and commentary urging the termination of the un-American Federal Reserve Bank, and the offshore bankers’ control over the U.S. Treasury, “the arc of Western Civilization has gone from ‘ascent’—belief in God—focused on the higher centers of love, joy, purity and selflessness, to descent . . . focused on the lower centers of consciousness like those of power, wealth and physical gratification. The apex was called the ‘Enlightenment,’ when the ‘Illuminated ones’—a Luciferian term meaning ‘keepers of the light’—took over for God.Typical of Satan, decline into moral darkness is represented as light.”(11)

Light and sound is generated and measured mathematically, according to frequencies. It stands to reason then, following Schauf’s empirically evidenced thesis, we are engaged in a “conspiracy reality” in which ultimate power and control is waged bio-energetically (i.e., bio-spiritually), through frequency modulations or electromagnetic manipulations affecting “consciousness” and impacting biology, physiology, and human behavior.

The Rockefeller Foundation and Military Music

In 1913, the Rothschilds set up their third and current central bank in America, the Federal Reserve Bank,with the help of their agents JP Morgan and JD Rockefeller, whose investments in American industry had been Rothschild-financed since 1865. (9 ,11)

World Wars I and II evidence the banking cartel’s profitable depopulation politics and policies. For instance, in 1914, at the beginning of World War I, the German Rothschild bank loaned money to the German government, the British Rothschild bank loaned money to Britain, and the French Rothschild bank loaned money to the French government.War propaganda served the Rothschild’s geopolitical and financial agendas, and was provided by the three main European news agencies, Wolff in Germany,Reuters in England, and Havas in France, each financed by Rothschild banks. (9 , 11)

Between World Wars I and II, accelerating during the 1930s, scientific studies in musical frequencies best suited for war-making were funded by the Rothschild-Rockefeller alliance, represented by the Rockefeller Foundation and U.S. Navy.(8-11)

A major objective of this war, and profitable population control, research was to determine the musical factors capable of producing psychopathology, emotional distress, and “mass hysteria.”(8)

Academically directed by grants provided by the Rockefeller Foundation, in concert with the US Navy and National Defense Research Council according to the foundation’s archives, acoustic energy researchers, including Harold Burris-Meyer, an audio engineer and drama instructor at New Jersey’s Stevens Institute of Technology, were commissioned.(8)

Burris-Meyer is best known for providing consulting services to the Muzak Corporation, “which used his expertise to optimize sound installations in factories so that emotional motivation of workers achieved through music would not be adversely effected by factory noise . . ,”wrote James Tobias , a Professor of English at the Univ. of Calif.(8)

Tobias reviewed Rockefeller Foundation(RF) archives, and documented investigations leading to psychological warfare applications of acoustic vibrations,ultimately advanced militarily and commercially.(8)

Burris-Meyer, according to Tobias, contributed to the Department of Defense during World War II, “including building speaker arrays deployed on warplanes such that enemy combatants could be addressed from the air” to produce psycho-emotional affects leading to“mass hysteria.”(8)

Additionally, the Princeton Radio Project played a role in this research. This occurred precisely at the time the atomic bomb Manhattan Project was beginning at Princeton involving Albert Einstein at the Institute for Advanced Study (IAS).(12)

Poisonous Medicine and the Rockefeller Foundation’s Investments in Sickening “Music”

Linking this “conspiracy reality” to the development of music for “mass hysteria,” and aversive public health impacts, the IAS “think tank” was formed from the “vision of founding Director Abraham Flexner,” according to the IAS website.(13) The infamous Abraham Flexner , educated in Germany and America, on staff at the Carnegie Foundation, and funded by the Rockefeller Foundation,sourced the American medical reformation following US Congressional acceptance of his “Flexner Report.”(14) This infamous treatise exclusively benefited the Anglo-American IG Farben-Rockefeller petrochemical-pharmaceutical alliance that vilified every form of natural healing to monopolize healthcare. Based on Flexner’s report, advancing the Rockefeller’s agenda, the US Government exclusively imposed medicine’s reliance on deadly, not curative,drugs as is ongoing today.

The Rockefeller Foundation’s Assistant Director for the Humanities at the time Flexner compiled his report was John Marshall, who along with the authors of Composing for the Films (Oxford University Press, 1947) Hanns Eisler and Theodor Adorno, were featured performers in the musical projects serving military and commercial interests, juxtaposed with artistic and philanthropic objectives.

As this research and development of the broadcasting industry advanced to impact “herd behavior” and public health, it is clear that any malady generated musically/vibrationally (i.e., bio-energetically), would increase investors’ profitability.

Although Eisler or Adorno appear to be innocent of wrongdoing, according to Tobias, both were unfavorably treated by project officials. Eisler opposed the militarization of music used for cultural manipulation, and was eventually deported following years of harassment by the Federal Bureau of Investigation(FBI). This publicity generated embarrassment for the Rockefeller Foundation.

According to Tobias, Burris-Meyer became convinced that “audio control of human emotions was possible for a large enough portion of an audience to provide effective crowd control – a line of research,” that John Marshall,“ultimately found irrelevant for understanding the artistic or cultural values of music. . . . ” but obviously fulfilled a military objective.

This best explains why this activity is linked in time, subject matter, Foundation funding, and the Rothschild-Rockefeller increasing war investments in Germany, Great Britain, and the US, to establishing the Western World’s standard musical tuning of A=440Hz frequency. The fact that A=440Hz standard tuning is relatively distressing, as adequately evidenced below and elsewhere ,(7, 20-22) implicates these parties and their research into aversive musical frequencies for military and commercial uses.

Raising more suspicion, when I personally contacted Professor Tobias to request his consent to link his online paper to this article, to pull quotes of up to 600 words from it, or receive a submission from him for publication in Medical Veritas journal, he declined saying he did not wishto jeopardize future publication of his work. However, a simple Internet search located his manuscript already published by the Rockefeller Archive Center with the following ethically repugnant notice:

“This research report is presented here with the author’s permission but should not be cited or quoted without the author’s consent. . . .“Rockefeller Archive Center Research Reports Online is a periodic publication of the Rockefeller Archive Center. . . . intended to foster the network of scholarship in the history of philanthropy and to highlight the diverse range of materials and subjects covered in the collections at the Rockefeller Archive Center. The reports are drawn from essays submitted by researchers who have visited the Archive Center, many of whom have received grants from the Archive Center to support their research. The ideas and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and are not intended to represent the Rockefeller Archive Center.”

Frankly, under “fair use” copyright laws, Dr. Tobias, and the Rockefeller Archive Center, has zero right to prohibit his Internet published work, currently available for review here, to be withheld from public scrutiny and scholarly commentary, particularly as it involves matters of widespread psychosocial pathology, public health,and national security, not simply “the history of philanthropy.” For the record, Dr. Tobias neglected to reply to my invitation to prepare a

Medical Veritas submission, or consent to be interviewed by me on this topic.

Part 2 – RCA, GE and the Navy

You can download the entire report by right-clicking HERE and selecting “Save link as…”

Coleman Sundome 3 7'x7' - 3 Person Tent

by Coleman (52) Buy new: $50.84 - $86.97

Through powers granted to himself, with the signing of Executive Order 13606, Obama has taken yet another step towards imperialism, and furthering the progress of the new world order using U.S. foreign policy as the conduit to impose United Nations mandates. Last week, Obama created a new government agency to act as an international police force, charged with identifying war crimes, crimes against humanity and other atrocities.

The agency, dubbed: “The White House Atrocities Prevention Board” (APB) will be staffed by senior gov’t officials from across several other agencies, and will meet regularly at the White House to formulate tactics on combating atrocities in foreign countries, under the pretext that atrocities committed by other nations against their own people is a serious risk to national security as well as a moral imperative.

While I abhor the subjugation, torture and genocide of ANY people, ANYWHERE in the world, to call this a matter of national security is flatly ludicrous. This seems more like another phase in the ongoing agenda of frightening Americans into giving up even more of the their freedoms while simultaneously granting the U.S. carte blanche to run roughshod over the sovereignty of other nations. All thinly veiled under the seemingly benevolent guise of protecting the citizens of the world from atrocities.

With the creation of the APB and the signing of the executive order, Obama has granted himself the power to intervene in the affairs of other countries whom the US deems to be committing atrocities against its own people. If the country won’t comply peacefully, the US will proceed to coerce compliance through UN-endorsed mandates outlined in the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine, which stipulates the use of economic sanctions and military force.

This really isn’t anything new. It’s not like the US has never claimed humanitarian motives for engaging the military in wars and conflicts, without the approval of Congress. But now it has become official policy, and it redefines national sovereignty as a privilege that may be revoked by the US and UN at any time they see fit.

Obama has appointed White House National Security Advisor, Samantha Power to head the APB. A choice that has been met with some suspicion among critics, since she was the driving force responsible for the creation of the agency and developing the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine in the first place.

From The New American:

Apart from the unconstitutionality of this use of the executive order, there is something sinister in the selection of Samantha Power to spearhead the search for atrocities.

One source claims that the very existence of the APB is due to Power’s own persistence in convincing the White House that discovering atrocities should be a “core national-security interest and a core moral responsibility of the United States.” The statement released concomitant with the issuing of the executive order evinces Power’s remarkable power of persuasion.

Samantha Power rose to prominence in government circles as part of her campaign to promote a doctrine known as the Responsibility to Protect. Notably, this philosophy was also espoused by Hanan Ashrawi, a Palestinian lawmaker who has publicly questioned the reality of the Holocaust and who was a dedicated lictor of the late leader of the Palestinian Liberation Organization — Yasser Arafat.

Responsibility to Protect (also known as Responsibility to Act) is a doctrine advanced by the United Nations and is predicated on the proposition that sovereignty is a privilege not a right and that if any regime in any nation violates the prevailing precepts of acceptable governance, then the international community is morally obligated to revoke that nation’s sovereignty and assume command and control of the offending country.

There are three pillars of the United Nations’ backed Responsibility to Protect are:

A state has a responsibility to protect its population from mass atrocities,
The international community has a responsibility to assist the state if it is unable to protect its population on its own.
If the state fails to protect its citizens from mass atrocities and peaceful measures have failed, the international community has the responsibility to intervene through coercive measures such as economic sanctions. Military intervention is considered the last resort.
Records indicate that the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, of which Samantha Power is a co-founder, participated in the advisory board of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty that was established by the Canadian government in September 2000 to address the growing problem of “mass atrocities.”

It was this “independent” commission that coined the term “responsibility to protect.”

Also of significance to the current examination of the newly-minted Atrocities Prevention Board and its chief, Samantha Power, is the fact that the latter is the founding executive director and the head of the Carr Center at the precise time it was helping to hammer out the details of the implementation of the Responsibility to Protect.

There are other more ominous threads in the tapestry depicting the relationship that exists among President Obama, Samantha Power, the Atrocities Prevention Board, the United Nations, and America’s official sponsorship of the Responsibility to Protect.

The worldwide leader in the promotion of this sovereignty stealing doctrine that Samantha Power worked to develop is the Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect (GCR2P).

As published on its website, the Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect’s mission is:

… to help transform the principle of the responsibility to protect into a practical guide for action in the face of mass atrocities. The GCR2P was founded by leading figures in government and academia, as well as by International Crisis Group, Human Rights Watch, Oxfam International, Refugees International, and WFM-Institute for Global Policy.   The GCR2P engages in advocacy around specific crises; conducts research designed to further understanding of R2P; recommends and supports strategies to consolidate the norm and help states build capacity; and works closely with NGOs, governments and regional bodies which are seeking to operationalize the responsibility to protect.

One of the biggest financial supporters of the GCR2P is the Open Society Institute which itself is a branch of the Open Society Foundation, an organization created by leftist financier and Rothschild benefactor, George Soros.

A quick perusal of the GCR2P website reveals that Soros’ group is one of a very small cadre of sponsors not affiliated with any government. The other two being the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (a substantial funder of National Public Radio) and Scott and Elena Lawlor.

Apart from providing financial backing to the Right to Protect, Soros personally believes in and promotes the philosophy. In an article published by Foreign Policy in 2004 entitled “The People’s Sovereignty: How a New Twist on an Old Idea Can Protect the World’s Most Vulnerable Populations,” Soros presented his take on the principles that undergird the Right to Protect.

“[T]rue sovereignty belongs to the people, who in turn delegate it to their governments,” Soros wrote.

And:

If governments abuse the authority entrusted to them and citizens have no opportunity to correct such abuses, outside interference is justified. By specifying that sovereignty is based on the people, the international community can penetrate nation-states’ borders to protect the rights of citizens.

In particular, the principle of the people’s sovereignty can help solve two modern challenges: the obstacles to delivering aid effectively to sovereign states, and the obstacles to global collective action dealing with states experiencing internal conflict.

So deep are Soros’ roots in the Right to Protect family tree that Ramesh Thakur, one of the men credited with first uttering the term “responsibility to protect,” sits with Soros on several boards and is in fact a fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation, which participates in international efforts with another institute founded by Soros.

The picture is darker still. Thakur, the co-author of the Right to Protect doctrine that is so dear to Atrocities Board leader Samantha Power, was quoted in a Canadian newspaper article published in March 2011 pushing for a “global rebalancing” and “international redistribution” of power that would usher in a “new world order.”

Seems that President Obama and those of his progressive ilk are not content with the forced redistribution of wealth, but insist on wresting control of all the governments of the world and assigning sovereignty to those who will commit to following the orders and heeding the policy directives of the United Nations, the Right to Protect crowd, and George Soros.

With the naming of Samantha Power to direct the Atrocities Prevention Board, President Barack Obama has now officially given Right to Protect the imprimatur of the United States of America. Let us hope that our own national government is not being purposefully mis-managed in such a way as to invite a revocation of our sovereignty by the United Nations under the authority of the Right to Protect nor a domestic demonstration of what Samantha Power describes as a “meaningful military presence” that she believes is appropriate when a nation’s sovereignty must be re-distributed to those who share her worldview.

Coleman Sundome 3 7'x7' - 3 Person Tent

by Coleman (52) Buy new: $50.84 - $86.97

Musical Mind Control – The Rockefeller Foundations’s War on Concsiousness – Part 1

Coleman Sundome 3 7'x7' - 3 Person Tent

Obama Grants Himself Power to Redistribute Sovereignty – Appoints “Atrocities Czar”

Coleman Sundome 3 7'x7' - 3 Person Tent